Intekhab Alam @ Istekhan Alam @ Nice @ Md. Inekhab @ Istekharnarah @ Md. Intekhab @ Istekhan v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.8681 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -950 Year- 2016 Thana -BEGUSARAI COMPLAINT CASE DistrictBEGUSARAI ====================================================== INTEKHAB ALAM @ ISTEKHAN ALAM @ NICE @ MD. INEKHAB @ ISTEKHARNARAH @ MD. INTEKHAB @ ISTEKHAN, S/O Md. Yusuf Sah, R/V- Rahmat Nagar Dhuniya Patti, P.S. Banmankhi, DistrictPurnea. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Dolly Khatoon, W/O Intekhab Alam alias Istekhan Alam alias Nice alias Md. Inekhab alias Istekharnarah @ Md. Intekhab @ Istekhan, R/M- at present resdiding Panchvir, P.S. Sahebpur, District-Begusarai. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Arbind Kumar Pandey, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner is languishing in custody since 20.11.2017 in a case for the offence registered under Section 498(A) of the IPC.
The prosecution story, in brief, is that the accused persons including the petitioner tortured the victim due to nonfulfilment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8681 of 2018 (2) dt.13-02-2018 2/2 petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.
On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ complaint case.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M. Vth, Begusarai, in connection with Complaint Case No. 950C of 2016. U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T