The State Of Bihar v. Arrah-Sasaram Light Railway Company Limited (In Vlountary Liquidation)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1642 of 2022 In FIRST APPEAL No.142 of 2017 ====================================================== 1.

The State of Bihar through Collector, Rohtas at P.O. and P.S. - Sasaram, District - Rothas.

2.

The Anchal Adhikari, Sasaram, at P.O. and P.S. - Sasaram, District - Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Arrah- Sasaram Light Railway Company Limited (in Vlountary Liquidation) through 2.

Sri Kedar Nath Fatehpuria Volunary Liquidator of Arrah - Sasaram Light Railway at registered office Mercantile Building 2nd Floor, 9, Lal Bazar Street, Kolkata - 700001.

3.

Sri Krishna Kumar Singh S/o Sri Hari Narayan Singh, resident of Premchand Path, Gaurakshni, Sasaram, P.O. and P.S. - Sasaram, District - Rohtas.

4.

Subodh Kumar Singh, S/o Hari Narayan Singh, Resident of Village - Tilai, P.S. - Nokha, District - Rohtas.

5.

Arun Kumar Singh, S/o Hari Narayan Singh, Resident of Village - Tilai, P.S. - Nokha, District - Rohtas.

6.

Hari Narayan Singh, S/o Late Doman Singh, Resident of Village - Tilai, P.S. - Nokha, District - Rohtas.

7.

Smt. Babuni Devi, W/o Sri Hari Narayan Singh, Resident of Village - Tilai, P.S. - Nokha, District - Rohtas.

8.

Union of India through General Manager East Central Railway, Hazipur. 9.

Divisional Railway Manager, East Central Railway Mughal Sarai, District - Chandauli U.P.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Suryakant Kumar (AC to GA 8) For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Siddharth Harsh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 30-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the averments in the application as

Patna High Court MJC No.1642 of 2022(4) dt.30-11-2022 2/2 also the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the Court is satisfied that the petitioners have made out a case for restoration of the appeal.

The application is allowed and the appeal (F.A.No.142 of 2017) is restored to its original file. (Partha Sarthy, J) Bibhash U