Rajaram Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48775 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-56 Year-2024 Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL District- Begusarai ====================================================== 1.
Rajaram Yadav Son of Late Chano Yadav Resident of Pathla Tola, Lakhanpur, P.S- Muffasil, Lakhi OP, Dist- Begusarai 2.
Kargil Kumar @ Kargil Yadav son of Rajaram Yadav Resident of Pathla Tola, Lakhanpur, P.S- Muffasil, Lakhi OP, Dist- Begusarai 3.
Mahesh Rai @ Maheshwar Rai Son of Triveni Rai @ Maheshwar Rai Resident of Pathla Tola, Lakhanpur, P.S- Muffasil, Lakhi OP, Dist- Begusarai ... ... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s:
Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-11-2025 Heard learned Advocate for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Begusarai Muffasil P.S. Case No. 56 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 354B, 448, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Allegedly, on the fateful day, all the F.I.R. named accused persons barged into the house of the informant and started abusing. On protest being made, the petitioners along with others brutally assaulted the informant and others due to which they sustained serious injuries. It is also alleged that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48775 of 2025(3) dt.04-11-2025 2/3 accused persons also misbehaved with the family members of the informant.
4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner contended that for an occurrence which took place on 02.02.2024, the present F.I.R. was instituted on 04.02.2024 with an omnibus nature of allegation. Moreover, the injuries which is said to have been sustained to the informant and one other that has been found to be simple in nature. The petitioners and the informant belong to the same village and on account of land dispute both of them entered into free a fight resulted into some unfortunate injuries. Moreover, the petitioners are men of fair antecedent and they undertake that they they will fully cooperate in the proceedings.
5. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that petitioners have actively participated in the crime.
6. Having considered the submissions set forth by the learned Advocate for the respective parties and taking note of delay in lodging of the F.I.R. coupled with the omnibus nature of allegation and simple nature of injuries, besides fair antecedent, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48775 of 2025(3) dt.04-11-2025 3/3 period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai, in connection with Begusarai Muffasil P.S. Case No. 56 of 2024, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS, with further condition that one of the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner. (Harish Kumar, J) manish/- U