Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6428/2018bail granted

Sonu Singh @ Sonu Pratap Singh @ Avinash Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2018-02-06Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6428 of 2018 (2) dt.06-02-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6428 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -533 Year- 2016 Thana -MOTIHARI TOWN DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Sonu Singh @ Sonu Pratap Singh @ Avinash Singh, Son of Binod Singh, Resident of Village-Ruphari, P.S. Shikarganj, District-East Champaran .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Dilip Kumar Tondon, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Ms. Asha Devi, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 06-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 11.03.2017 in connection with Motihari Town P.S. Case No. 533 of 2016 for the offences alleged under Section 386 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated only on the extra judicial confessional statement of coaccused Munchun Sah who himself has been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 46388 of 2017. Except such confessional statement, there is no other material to connect the petitioner with the alleged occurrence.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6428 of 2018 (2) dt.06-02-2018 satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Sadar at Motihari, in connection with Motihari Town P.S. Case No. 533 of 2016, on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(iv) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/- U T