Rajesh Kumar @ Pintu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46807 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1195 Year-2018 Thana- EAST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- East Champaran ====================================================== Rajesh Kumar @ Pintu Kumar S/o Bageshwar Prasad Resident of VillageRaghunathpur, Ward No. 2, P.S.- Turkaulia (Raghunathpur O.P.), DistrictEast Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Ashok Kumar Pandey Son of Late Surendra Pandey Resident of VillageRaghunathpur, Ward No. 4, P.S.- Turkaulia, Raghunathpur, District- East Champaran.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 420 of the I.P.C. and section 138 of the N.I. Act.

From perusal of mediation report dated 05.12.2019, it appears that the dispute between the parties has been resolved through process of mediation on the terms of settlement mutually agreed by the parties.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as nature of accusation, in the event of his

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46807 of 2019(4) dt.20-02-2020 2/2 arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bailbond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M., 2nd Class, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Complaint Case No.1195 of 2018, on the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) S.Katyayan/- U T