← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6710/2021bail rejected

Vishal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2021-08-09Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6710 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-132 Year-2020 Thana- PUNPUN District- Patna ====================================================== VISHAL KUMAR SON OF AJAY RAY RESIDENT OF VILLAGEDHAMOUL, POLICE STATION- PARSA BAZAR, DISTRICT-PATNA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 09-08-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under sections 302, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act. As per allegation in the F.I.R., on hulla being raised, the informant went in the said direction on which it transpired that two accused persons had shot his son who died in course of treatment.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the F.I.R. was registered against two unknown. The name of the petitioner transpired in the confessional statement of Raushan Kumar made before police. No incriminating article has been recovered from the petitioner's possession who is in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6710 of 2021(5) dt.09-08-2021 2/2 custody since 2.6.2020 and investigation in the case has concluded.

Heard learned A.P.P. for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case including the co-accused namely Raushan Kumar, Pawan Kumar and Dharamveer Kumar Ram, having all in their statements naming the petitioner as the assailant, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected.

Liberty is granted to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after six months in case there is no progress in the learned court below.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Saurabh/- U T