Sushila Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.52096 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -152 Year- 2017 Thana -BARH District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Sushila Devi W/o Mahendra Chaudhary, R/o Village- Sarkati, P.S.- Barh, District- Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Kashyap For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Anil Kumar Singh 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 09-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the State.

The petitioner apprehends her arrest in Barh P.S. Case No. 152/2017 instituted for the offences under Sections 304(B), 34, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is mother-in-law of the deceased. There is general and omnibus allegation against this petitioner.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Barh P.S. Case No. 152/2017, she shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52096 of 2017 (2) dt.09-11-2017 2/2 each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barh, Patna, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J.) Rakhi U T