← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/17749/2021dismissed

Nirad Shardal v. The Bihar Staff Selection Commission

2024-03-06Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17749 of 2021 ====================================================== Nirad Shardal Son of Uday Prasad Sindh, Resident of Village - Rangra, Near Durga Mandir, Ward No. 10, P.S. - Rangra, District - Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Bihar Staff Selection Commission Patna through its Chairman. 2.

The Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Patna. 3.

The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Department of Health, Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Health, Bihar, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Yadav, Adv.

For the State :

Mr.S.D. Yadav, AAG Mr. Anil Kumar Verma, AC to AAG-9 For the BSSC :

Mr. Bikash Tiwary, Adv.

Mr. Anjani Kumar Mishra, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 06-03-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1. That the petitioner seeks indulgence of this Hon'ble Court for issuance of appropriate order/orders, direction/direction, writ/writs preferably in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the Respondent commission to appoint the petitioner on the post of Sanitary Inspector Health Department after affording him proper opportunity to participate in the interview, who has already declared successful candidate in the written examination and even called for participating in the counseling for such appointment against advertisement No.

Patna High Court CWJC No.17749 of 2021(2) dt.06-03-2024 2/2 08010116 vide Roll No. 100246 but subsequently petitioner was not called for participating in interview process, reason best known to the Respondent Commission."

2.

After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the Respondents authorities for redressal of his aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The present writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U