Bade Paswan @ Manoj @ Ranjit Paswan @ Bhojpuria v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.26196 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-45 Year-2014 Thana- RANIYATALAB District- Patna ====================================================== Bade Paswan @ Manoj @ Ranjit Paswan @ Bhojpuria, Son of Rameshwar Paswan alias Ram Ishwar Paswan, Resident of Village- Sobhi Dumra, Police Station- Ararh Muffasil, District- Bhojpur.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Narendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Smt. Veena Rani Prasad (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 02-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew the prayer of bail which was earlier thrice rejected vide order dated 08.04.2016, 05.10.2016 and 09.08.2017 passed in Cri. Misc. No. 6769 of 2016, Cr. Misc. No. 43220 of 2016 and Cr. Misc. No. 34713 of 2017 respectively, on the ground that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 25.08.2015, only on suspicion the informant has implicated the petitioner, earlier Malti Devi was married twice with another persons thereafter, she was married with the petitioner three years ago, there is no eye-witness of the occurrence, there is no progress in the trial and up till now only three prosecution witnesses have been examined and, as such,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26196 of 2018(2) dt.02-05-2018 2/2 the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration. The learned A.P.P. submits that the petitioner was fleeing away from the room wherein Malti Devi was found dead as her throat was cut.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, at present, finding no good ground for reconsideration of prayer of the bail, again prayer of the bail of the petitioner stands rejected. However, the learned trail Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same preferably within two months, from date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, failing which if the petitioner at no fault, may be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rajiv/- U T