Patna High CourtCR. MISC./59986/2021rejected

Surendra Rai @ Satyendra Kumar @ Satendra Ray v. The State Of Bihar

2022-06-06Mr. Justice Shailendra Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59986 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-56 Year-2021 Thana- AWTARNAGAR District- Saran ====================================================== Surendra Rai @ Satyendra Kumar @ Satendra Ray S/o- Sri Vishvanath Rai Resident of Village - Jhauaa Tola, P.S. - Avtarnagar, District - Saran at Chapra. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Prabhakar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER 06-06-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month.

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with Avtarnagar P.S. Case No. 56 of 2021, registered for the offence under Sections 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The main submissions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner are that in actual there is a dispute between the petitioner and his brother who fabricated a false story in collusion with informant, the alleged cheque was issued on 16.10.2020 which was deposited by the informant on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59986 of 2021(2) dt.06-06-2022 2/2 20.10.2020 but after more than three months period the present case was lodged by the informant. Further submission is that the petitioner is a handicapped person and not in position to move freely.

Heard both the sides and perused the FIR. The main allegation against the petitioner is that he took Rs. 2,25,000/- from the informant on the pretext of providing a job to his son in Food Corporation of India. When he failed to provide the job, the informant demanded the said money. On such demand, the informant was given a blank cheque by the brother of the petitioner as submitted and the same was dishonoured by the bank concerned. The nature of allegation is serious and the same relates to cheating punishable under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

Considering the above facts, this application for anticipatory bail is dismissed.

(Shailendra Singh, J) siddharthkr/- U T