Bijendra Verma v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6262 of 2018 (2) dt.01-02-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6262 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -93 Year- 2017 Thana -RANIYATALAB District- PATNA ====================================================== Bijendra Verma, son of Late Mahaveer Verma, resident of villageShivpur, Police Station- Rani Talab, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjana, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 01-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 10.07.2017 in connection with Rani Talab P.S. Case No. 93 of 2017 for the offences alleged under Sections 364, 365/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the backdrop of Rani Talab P.S. Case No. 113 of 2017 lodged by the petitioner against the informant and also as the petitioner is a witness in some cases relating to land dispute involving the informant. Similarly situated co-accused Karu Singh @ Dhananjay Kumar has been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 59320 of 2017.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6262 of 2018 (2) dt.01-02-2018 satisfaction of Sri Praveen Kumar Malbiya, learned Judicial Magistrate, Danapur, Patna, in connection with Rani Talab P.S. Case No. 93 of 2017, on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(iv) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/- U T