Jai Ram Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62423 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-94 Year-2021 Thana- KHAIRA District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

JAI RAM SINGH Son of Late Dharm Nath Singh Resident of Village - Afaur, P.S.- Khaira (Nagra), Distt.- Chapra (Saran). 2.

HARE RAM SINGH Son of Late Dharm Nath Singh Resident of Village - Afaur, P.S.- Khaira (Nagra), Distt.- Chapra (Saran). 3.

POONAM DEVI W/o Jai Ram Singh Resident of Village - Afaur, P.S.- Khaira (Nagra), Distt.- Chapra (Saran).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Binod Murari Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Yogendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 18-05-2022 At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the petition of petitioner no.1, namely, Jai Ram Singh and petitioner no.2, namely, Hare Ram Singh.

Permission is accorded.

Accordingly, the petition of petitioner no.1, namely, Jai Ram Singh and petitioner no.2, namely, Hare Ram Singh is dismissed as withdrawn.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner no.3, namely, Poonam Devi and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner no.3 is apprehending her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307 and 354/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62423 of 2021(2) dt.18-05-2022 2/2 It is a case of assault upon the informant by means of rod by the accused persons.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that there is case and counter case between the parties and both parties have sustained injuries as alleged in separate incident. Petitioner no.3 has got clean antecedent. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioner no.3, namely, Poonam Devi, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Chapra (Saran) in connection with Khaira (Nagra) P.S. Case No. 94 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U T