Bihar State Panchayat Rojgar Sewak Sangh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3190 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 17993 of 2013 ====================================================== Bihar State Panchayat Rojgar Sewak Sangh (Gope Gut) District Branch Bhjpur At Ara Through Its District President Ramesh Singh Yadav Son of Late Bhagwan Singh Yadav Residnet of Villlage - Sarfafar, P.O. - Gangrajgan, P.S. - Udwant Angar, Distt - Bhojpur (Bihar) .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar Through Sri Mihir kumar Singh Development Commissioner, Government of Bihar Patna
2. Sri.S. Sidharth The Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar Pata
3. Sri Vijay Laxmi, Divisional Commissioner, Patna Division, Patna (Bihar)
4. Sri Pankaj Pal, The District Magistrate, Bhojpur At Ara (Bihar)
5. Sri Suresh Kumar Singh , The Depurty Development Commissioner, Bhojpur at Ara (Bihar)
6. Smt Sushiee Aruan, The District Programme Officer, Bhojpur At Ara (Bihar)
7. Sri Anil Kumar, The Sub Divisional Officer, Ara District - Bhojpur
8. Sri Manoj Kumar, The Sub Divisional Officer, Piro, District - Bhojpur.
9. Sri Satyendra Kumar Singh The Sub Divisional Officer, Jagdishpur, Distt - Bhojpr.
10. Sri Samiullah, The Executive Engineer, D.R.D.A., Bhojpur At Ara (Bihar)
11. Sri Sanya Devi, The District Account Officer, D.R.D.A., Bhojpur, Ara (Bihar)
12. Sri Parmatma Singh, The Block Development Officer, Udwant Nagar, Distt - Bhojpur (Bihar) .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhanendra Chaubey For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 18-10-2017 Considering the fact that the respondents have already decided the representation vide Annexure-A no case is made out for proceeding contempt.
This application is dismissed accordingly.
Patna High Court MJC No.3190 of 2014 (3) dt.18-10-2017 2/2 In case the petitioner has any further grievance it may challenge the order afresh rejecting its representation in accordance with law.
(Rajendra Menon, CJ) mrl./- U