← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./49505/2026bail granted

Mintu Sah @ Sukhram Sahu @ Sukhrah Sah @ Mintu v. The State Of Bihar

2026-07-22Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49505 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-117 Year-2026 Thana- KISHANPUR District- Supaul ====================================================== Mintu Sah @ Sukhram Sahu @ Sukhrah Sah @ Mintu S/O Gosai Sah R/O Village- Piprahi, Ward No. 16, P.S.- Pipra, Dist.- Supaul. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nafisu Zzoha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 22-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in Kishanpur P.S. Case No. 117 of 2026 instituted for the offences under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that 324 liters liquor was recovered from Car and the petitioner was arrested on spot.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. It is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49505 of 2026(2) dt.22-07-2026 2/2 further submitted that the petitioner is neither owner nor driver of the car and he had got no knowledge of the alleged recovery. The petitioner is in custody since 27.05.2026 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of B.N.S.S., 2023.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, clean antecedent and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.15,000/- (Fifteen thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Kishanpur P.S. Case No. 117 of 2026.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) sukriti/- U T