Dilip Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2055 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17523 of 2022 ====================================================== Dilip Kumar Son of Sri Kapleshwar Pandit, Resident of Village- Savant, P.O.- Chhaurahi, P.S. Chhaurahi, District- Begusarai, Presently working as Block Teacher, U.M.S. Bakhadda (Chhaurahi), Block- Chhaurahi DistrictBegusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Sri Pankaj Kumar, the Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 2.

Smt. Sharmila Rai, the District Education Officer, Begusarai. 3.

Sri Ravindra Sah, the District Programme Officer (Establishment), Begusarai.

4.

Sri Ram Pukar Yadav, the Block Development Officer, Chhaurahi, P.O. and P.S. Chhaurahi, District- Begusarai.

5.

Sri Dani Rai, the Block Education Officer, Chhaurahi, P.O. and P.S. Chhaurahi, District- Begusarai.

6.

Sri Mahabir Prasad Yadav, the Headmaster, Upgraded Middle School, Bakhadda (Chhaurahi), Block- Chhaurahi, P.O. and P.S.- Chhaurahi, District- Begusarai.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bipin Bihari Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jai Prabhat Kishore, AC to SC 13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 28-11-2025 Heard the parties.

2. By the order under contempt dated 02.01.2023 passed in CWJC No. 17523 of 2022, it was directed that the salary of teachers shall not be withheld on any excuse and the arrears of salary shall also be released, if the same has not been released within the stipulated period, the teachers would be entitled to receive interest on arrears of the amount of salary @ 9%.

Patna High Court MJC No.2055 of 2023(4) dt.28-11-2025 2/2

3. A show cause affidavit has been filed and the amount of the petitioner for the period he worked has been paid.

4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has serious reservation with regard to the calculation of the amount and its mode and manner, for which he seeks liberty to assail the same.

5. In view of the submissions advanced by the learned Advocates for the respective parties and considering the averments made in the show cause affidavit, this Court does not find any reason or occasion to continue with the present contempt petition. Accordingly, the same stands closed with the liberty aforesaid.

(Harish Kumar, J) Anjani/- U