The Union Of India And ORS v. Parmanand Singh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Letters Patent Appeal No.1560 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20574 of 2016 ======================================================
1. The Union of India through the Ministry of Home Affairs through the Director General of Police, Central Reserve Police Force (hereinafter referred to as the (CRPF), Block-1, CGO Complx, Lodi Road, New Delhi
2. The Special Director General of Police, C.R.P.F. Central Zone, H.C. Block, Salt Lake, Sector-3, Kolkata
3. The Inspector General of Police, CRPF, Bihar Sector, Ashiyana Digha Road, Patna
4. The Dy. Inspector General of Police, CRPF, Group Centre, Muzaffarpur
5. The Dy. Inspector General of Police, Group Centre CRPF, Talengaon, Pune, Maharashtra
6. The Commandant, 160 Battalion, CRPF, Channi Rama, Jammu (J & K.) ... ... Appellant/s
Versus
1. Parmanand Singh, son of Late Kamdeo Singh, resident of VillageMaheshpur, P.S. Piri Bazar, District- Lakhisarai at present residing at Quarter No. 183, Block No. 13, Type-1, Central Reserve Police Force, Group Centre, Muzaffarpur ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s :
Mr. Ravinder Kumar Sharma, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date : 13-07-2018 Seeking exception to an order passed by the learned Writ Court on 17.05.2017 in C.W.J.C. No. 20574 of 2016, this appeal has been filed by the Union of India.
For vacating the quarter in question from the respondent employee who was transferred to Jammu & Kashmir and thereafter to North East Area, the reason for vacation was
Patna High Court LPA No.1560 of 2017 dt.13-07-2018 2/2 that he is retaining the quarter after his deployment out of the area but when the matter was agitated before the Writ Court, it was indicated that the quarter was vacated because of the misconduct committed by the employee and his son while retaining the quarter, inasmuch as, they fought and acted in an indisciplined manner with their neighbours.
The Learned Writ Court on examination of the facts found that the grounds now canvassed for vacation of the quarter did not form part of the allegations in the show-cause notice and interfered into the matter.
In doing so, no error has been committed by the Writ Court warranting reconsideration.
The Letters Patent Appeal stands dismissed.
(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) P.K.P./- AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.
CAV DATE N.A.
Uploading Date 17.07.2018 Transmission Date