Ravindra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.56239 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -130 Year- 2015 Thana -BACHWARA District- BEGUSARAI ======================================================

1. Ravindra Yadav, Son of Bhuttu Yadav, Resident of Village- Rajapur, P.S.- Bachhwara, District- Begusarai.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rai Mukesh Sharma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Kalyan Shankar(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 14-03-2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case for the offences punishable under sections 25 (1-b) a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. Allegedly, when the petitioner was receiving bag containing fire arms from the co-accused he was caught and after search one six round revolver, one pistol with magazine, one extra magazine, one country made pistol, two mobile sets and motorcycle were recovered.

Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner has been made victim of the circumstances, there is no independent witness on the seizure list, as a matter of fact nothing was recovered and he has been implicated in this case resulting he

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.56239 of 2015 (7) dt.14-03-2016 2/2 is suffering in custody since 16.07.2015.

The learned A.P.P. opposes prayer for bail by submitting that earlier also the petitioner was involved in Bachhawara P.S. Case No. 16 of 2015 registered under sections 25 (1-b) a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act and as such the petitioner is habitual in dealing with the illegal fire arms. In the facts and circumstances as stated above, at present this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and accordingly his such prayer stands rejected in connection with Bachhawara P.S. Case No. 130 of 2015 pending in the court of Sri Pankaj Pandey, J.M. 1st Class, Begusarai.

However, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and to conclude the same preferably within six months after keeping the same on the priority basis, failing which the petitioner, if at no fault, may renew his prayer for bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Abhay/- U T