Md. Wajuddin @ Wajuddin v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50448 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-772 Year-2022 Thana- ARARIA District- Araria ====================================================== Md. Wajuddin @ Wajuddin Son of Azeem Resident of Village- Belwa, Supan Tola, Ward No. 10, P.S.- Araria, District- Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gopal Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 23-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Araria P.S. Case No. 772 of 2022 instituted for the offence under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code. Subsequently, Section 411 of the IPC was added.

3.

The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 05.09.2022, while the informant was returning home on a motorcycle with his labourer, Pritam Kumar, two unknown miscreants intercepted them near Araria Zeromile, assaulted the informant with a dagger causing injuries to his wrist and finger, and also assaulted Pritam Kumar.

4.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50448 of 2026(2) dt.23-07-2026 2/3 that the petitioner is in custody since 22.01.2026. Petitioner bears three (3) criminal antecedents, as per disclosure made in paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

5.

It has been further submitted by the petitioner's counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. Petitioner is not named in the FIR. Name of the petitioner has transpired on the basis of confessional statement of coaccused, namely, Izhar. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. There is no specific allegation attributed to the petitioner. Charge sheet has already been submitted in this case.

6.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 7.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner and charge sheet being submitted, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

8.

Let the petitioner be released on bail, after framing of charge, if not already framed, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Araria P.S. Case No. 772 of 2022, subject to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50448 of 2026(2) dt.23-07-2026 3/3 the following conditions:

(I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T