Lakshmi Kumari @ Lakshmi Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2056 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13344 of 2021 ====================================================== Lakshmi Kumari @ Lakshmi Devi Wife of Late Eshwar Ram, Resident of Village-Banjariya Pandal, Ward No. 6, Naya Tola, P.O.-Banjariya Pandal, District-Motihari, East Champaran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2.
Mr. Arbind Kumar Chaudhary, the Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3.
Mr. Arunish Chawla, the Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
4.
Mr. Arbind Kumar Jha, Deputy Secretary cum Director, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 5.
Mr. Saurabh Jorwal, the District Magistrate, Motihari. 6.
Mr. Parveen Kumar, Nagar Commissioner, Nagar Nigam, Motihari (Nagar Parishad changed into Nagar Nigam).
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shree Kant Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Abbas Haider (SC-6) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 26-09-2025 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Counsel for the Nagar Parishad, Motihari (Now Nagar Nigam, Motihari) and learned Counsel for the State.
2. It has been submitted by Counsel for the Nagar Parishad/Nagar Nigam that entire dues of the petitioner has been paid and there is nothing pending against the present petitioner. Counsel for the Nagar Nigam submits that Annexure-A/6, attached with the show-cause, indicates that the entire payment
Patna High Court MJC No.2056 of 2023(3) dt.26-09-2025 2/2 has been made.
3. Counsel for the petitioner, on the other hand, submits that it is true that he has received the payment. Therefore, he submits that the present M.J.C. application may be disposed off only with liberty that if any due found in future he may raise his claim.
4. In the light of the submission made by the parties, this application stands dismissed.
(Dr. Anshuman, J) Mkr./- U