Patna High CourtCR. MISC./5383/2016rejected

Chandan Kumar Sah @ Chadnan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2016-03-08Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.5383 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -284 Year- 2015 Thana -KUDRA District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR) ====================================================== Chandan Kumar Sah @ Chandan Kumar, Son of Jagdish Sah, Resident of Village- Majrarj, P.S- Nokha, District- Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Binod Kumar Yadav For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. C. Sen Prasad Singh (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-03-2016 Heard learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, and the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, appearing on behalf of the State.

This application for grant of anticipatory bail arises out of Kudra P.S. Case No. 284 of 2015, disclosing offences under sections 269, 270 & 272 of the Indian Penal Code & under section 47(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.

From the statement made in paragraph No.3 of the application, I find that the petitioner was made accused in a case registered for the offence under section 47 (a) of the Bihar Excise Act in the year, 2011 and subsequently in an another case again registered for the offence punishable under section 47 (a) of the Bihar Excise Act. The present case again for the offence committed under section 47 (a) of the Bihar Excise Act has been

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5383 of 2016 (2) dt.08-03-2016 2/2 instituted in the year, 2015.

Considering the criminal antecedent of the petitioner, since he is involved in cases of similar nature, I am not inclined to grant him the privilege of anticipatory bail. This application is, accordingly, rejected.

The petitioner is directed to surrender before the court below within four weeks from today and seek regular bail, if so advised. If he does so, his application for regular bail shall be considered on its own merits without being prejudiced by rejection of present application for grant of anticipatory bail. (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.) Rajiv/- U