Nilendu Kumar Singh @ Niraj Kumar Singh @ Nilendu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49814 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-21 Year-2022 Thana- NAYA RAM NAGAR District- Munger ====================================================== NILENDU KUMAR SINGH @ NIRAJ KUMAR SINGH @ NILENDU KUMAR Son of Dilip Prasad Singh Resident of village - Kabaiya, P.S.- Kahalgaon, District - Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Manohar Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Satyendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 14-02-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Baheri P.S. Case No. 21/2022, instituted for the offence under Sections 302/201/120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. As per allegation in the F.I.R., it is a case of commission of murder against the petitioner who is the husband of the deceased. She murdered by the petitioner with the help of his other associates he slit her throat with knife and threw the dead body. Police had recovered the dead body at the place of occurrence.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. There is no
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49814 of 2022(5) dt.14-02-2023 2/2 prior complain against the petitioner that he misbehaved with the deceased. Petitioner is in custody since 19.02.2022. Learned APP appearing on behalf for the State vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail and submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. He with the help of other associates killed the deceased by slit her throat with knife and threw the dead body. He is sole responsible for the murder of the deceased as being wife of the petitioner.
Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considering the nature of allegation, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and, as such, his prayer for bail stands rejected.
The trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as soon as possible.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Ranjeet/- U T