Chhotu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54266 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-126 Year-2025 Thana- GHORASAHAN District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Chhotu Kumar S/o Sunil Thakur Resident of Village-Koraiya Laukhan, P.S.- Ghorasahan, District-East Champaran, Motihari 2.

Monu Thakur @ Manu Thakur S/o Ram Vashisth Thakur @ Ram Vashit Thakur Resident of Village-Koraiya Laukhan, P.S.-Ghorasahan, District-East Champaran, Motihari ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sharda Nand Mishra For the State :

Mr.Uday Chand Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 12-08-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2. This is an application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioners for the offences alleged under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 76, 303(2), 352, 351(2) of the BNS, 2023, registered in connection Ghorasahan P.S.Case No. 126 of 2025.

3. As per allegation, the accused persons, including the petitioners, at the occasion of the marriage of the informant's nephew, created a ruckus and co-accused Shivashray Thakur assaulted the brother of the informant Sunil Thakur on his head, causing him injury. In the process, the uncle of the informant was also assaulted by the accused persons by farsa and they also snatched away jewellery and cash from the female members of the informant.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioners has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54266 of 2025(2) dt.12-08-2025 2/2 submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated. The allegations are general and omnibus. He also submitted that none has suffered any kind of injury which was the reason that despite repeated calls, the injury report was not produced in the lower court.

5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the above facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above-named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM, Sikrahna at Dhaka, East Champaran, Motihari, in connection with Ghorasahan P.S.Case No0. 126 of 2025, subject to the condition that the petitioners shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) HR/- U T