Jitendra Kumar Sahni And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.1281 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -171 Year- 2015 Thana -MUSAHRI District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================
1. Jitendra Kumar Sahni
2. Dharmendra Sahni both Sons of Hari Sahani, resident of village- Chhoti Kothia, P.S. Mushahari, District Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rina Sinha, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 19-02-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioners are accused in connection with Mushahari P.S. Case No. 171 of 2015 registered under Sections 272, 273, 304, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 47(a) of Bihar Excise Act, 1915.
The prosecution case is that the deceased Mohit Sahani and others had purchased illicit liquor from Suraj Sahani @ Suraaj Sahani of village Budhnagra Radha Later on, they suffered from stomach pain, and subsequently, Mohit Sahani died. It is also alleged that petitioners Jitendra Kumar Sahni, Dharmendra Sahni and others are also in the gang of Suraj Sahani @ Suraaj
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1281 of 2016 (3) dt.19-02-2016 2/2 Sahani.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that except the suspicion raised in the First Information Report, there is nothing on record against the petitioners and the petitioners are in custody since 13.10.2015.
Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioners above named, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 3rd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Mushahari P.S. Case No. 171 of 2015. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioners.
(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Vats/- U T