Patna High CourtCR. MISC./36509/2014bail granted

Kanik Lal Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2015-02-16Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.34264 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -66 Year- 2014 Thana -BARARI District- KATIHAR ====================================================== Amit Kumar Paswan @ Amit Paswan, Son of Kanik Lal Paswan R/oSukhasan, P.S.-Barari (Semapur), District -Katihar. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== With Criminal Miscellaneous No.36509 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -66 Year- 2014 Thana -BARARI District- KATIHAR ====================================================== Kanik Lal Paswan, S/o- Jagdeo Paswan, R/v- Sukhasan, P.S. Barari (Semapur), District Katihar .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

(In Cr.Misc. No.34264 of 2014) For the Petitioner : Mr. Vijay Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. B.N. Pandey, APP (In Cr.Misc. No.36509 of 2014) For the Petitioner : Mr. Vijay Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 16-02-2015 Heard both sides.

Petitioner Amit Kumar Paswan @ Amit Paswan in Cr. Misc. No.34264 of 2014 and petitioner Kanik Lal Paswan in Cr. Misc.No.36509 of 2014 apprehend their arrest in Barari (Semapur) P.S.Case No.66 of 2014, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420 and other sections of the Indian Penal Code. The informant alleged that Kanik Lal Paswan had

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34264 of 2014 (2) dt.16-02-2015 2/2 taken Rs.20,000/- for his treatment but when her husband demanded money, petitioners abused her son and started assaulting them.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the informant got simple injury on her right elbow. Petitioner Kanik Lal Paswan also filed a complaint case alleging therein that Dilip Paswan had taken money for digging earth and on account of this fact, some altercation took place.

Considering the facts aforesaid and the fact that the occurrence took place for a petty dispute for taking money and the informant and her son got simply injury, petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in connection with Barari (Semapur) P.S. Case No.66 of 2014, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

B.T/- (Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) U