← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./654/2016bail granted

Kaileshwar Tiwari @ Kailesar Tiwari @ Kaleshwar Tiwari @ Kauleshwar Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar

2016-03-08Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.654 of 2016 (3) dt.08-03-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.654 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -14 Year- 2015 Thana -SARAIYA District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================

1. KAILESHWAR TIWARI @ KAILESAR TIWARI @ KALESHWAR TIWARI @ KAULESHWAR TIWARI Son of Late Baijnath Tiwari R/o Village- Kuary, P.S.- Amnour, District- Saran (Chhapra) .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Upendra Kumar Chaubey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Madan Kumar(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 08-03-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Saraiya P.S. Case No. 14 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 365, 366/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, Rekha Devi the married niece of the informant became traceless and it is further alleged that the petitioner and other co-accused have kidnapped Rupam Kumari the daughter of the informant with intention either to marry with her or with bad intention.

Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner is an old man aged about 75 years, except one case wherein he is on bail he has got no criminal antecedent, without any legal and cogent material the petitioner is suffering in custody, no one has

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.654 of 2016 (3) dt.08-03-2016 seen the petitioner committing the crime, the petitioner has got no concern with Rekha Devi who has also been made accused and as such the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration to which learned APP opposes.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering that chargesheet has already been submitted and the petitioner is an old man, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., West Muzaffarpur in connection with Saraiya P.S. Case No. 14 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T