Billu @ Bilash Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60099 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-184 Year-2021 Thana- MANSI District- Khagaria ====================================================== BILLU @ BILASH YADAV Son of Nandani Yadav Resident of VillageThatha East, P.S.- Mansi, District- Khagaria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Hare Krishna Prasad, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Jai Narain Thakur, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 29-03-2022 Heard.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Mansi P.S. Case No. 184 of 2021, registered for the offence punishable under sections 341, 323, 379, 386, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation is regarding the petitioner having demanded extortion money to the tune of Rs. 5 lacs from the informant on gun point as also he is alleged to have snatched a sum of Rs. 5,000/- from the informant.

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent, has been falsely implicated in the present case and is languishing in custody since 31.07.2021. The learned

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60099 of 2021(2) dt.29-03-2022 2/3 counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that though the incident is stated to have taken place on 21.6.2021, however, the FIR has been lodged belatedly on 01.07.2021. It is further submitted that on account of land dispute, the present allegation has been levelled falsely against the petitioner herein. Nonetheless, it is submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by such conditions as may be deemed fit and proper to be imposed by this Court for the purposes of grant of bail.

Per contra, Shri Mukesh Kumar, the learned counsel appearing for the informant and Shri J.N. Thakur, the learned APP for the State, have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the submissions made by the parties and taking into account the period of incarceration of the petitioner as also considering the nature of allegation levelled against the petitioner herein though, I am inclined to admit the petitioner to the privilege of regular bail, however, subject to certain conditions.

Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60099 of 2021(2) dt.29-03-2022 3/3 of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court of C.J.M., Khagaria in connection with Mansi P.S. Case No. 184 of 2021, subject to further condition that the petitioner would mark his attendance before the S.H.O. of the concerned police station at 10 A.M. on each and every Monday of the week and in the event of his failure on two consecutive occasions to mark his attendance, the present privilege of bail being granted to the petitioner herein, shall stand revoked automatically and the petitioner shall be taken into custody forthwith. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Tiwary/- U T