Sudhakar Ram @ Sudhakar Kumar Suman v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52184 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-72 Year-2025 Thana- AANDAR District- Siwan ====================================================== Sudhakar Ram @ Sudhakar Kumar Suman, male, aged about-27 years, Son of Dilip Ram Resident of village - Bharauli, P.S.- Aandar, Distt.- Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Yogesh C. Verma Ms. Kumari Anupam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sucheta Yadav, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 16-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109, 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the BNS

3. As per the prosecution case, it is alleged that petitioner along with the other co-accused persons have assaulted the informant (deceased) and her family members after which she got some serious injuries and during medical treatment she died.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that both the parties are pattidar and there is case and counter-case between the parties. He further submits that petitioner has assaulted only upon one person, namely,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52184 of 2025(3) dt.16-10-2025 2/2 Dhananjay Ram by iron rod and no injury report has been produced in the entire case diary. He further submits that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner and the only allegation levelled against him is that he has assaulted one Dhananjay Ram by means of iron rod and other co-accused persons have assaulted the informant (deceased). He further submits that petitioner is in custody since 15.03.2025 and he has got clean antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition.

5. However, learned APP for the State oppose the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in connection with Andar P.S. Case No. 72 of 2025.

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Harshita/- U T