Dharamanath Sah @ Dharmnath Prasad v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11404 of 2024 ====================================================== Dharamanath Sah @ Dharmnath Prasad ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar & Ors.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Satyendra Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Aakash Chaturvedi, SC-13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 01-08-2024 Heard Mr. Satyendra Prasad Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Aakash Chaturvedi, learned advocate for the State.
2. The grievance of the petitioner is only confined to the demarcation of his land pertaining to plot No.2, Khata No.23, area 2 katha 15 dhur situated in village Sipah, Tauzi No.1670, RS No.359, Police Station Basantpur, District-Siwan.
3. The land in question is said to be ancestral property of the petitioner and the petitioner have been coming in peaceful possession of the same. It is also contended that the right and entitlement of the petitioner has been crystallized and a decree has also been issued in favour of the petitioner in Title Suit No.12/2001 by the Learned Munsif II, Siwan. It is also contended that some of the persons also preferred Title Appeal No.01/2010, which also stood dismiss by the Learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-III.
4. In the aforenoted premise, the petitioner approached before the Circle Officer, Basantpur, Siwan for
Patna High Court CWJC No.11404 of 2024(2) dt.01-08-2024 2/2 demarcation of the land but despite his application the copy of which is marked as Annexure-1 to the writ petition; till date no demarcation has been done. Aggrieved by the inaction of the Circle Officer, Basantpur, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition.
5.At this juncture, learned advocate for the State submits at the bar that the petitioner has remedy under the Bihar Land Dispute Resolution Act, wherein the DCLR is the competent authority who can look into the matter and resolve the dispute by passing an appropriate order of demarcation.
6. In view of the submissions made at the bar the present writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file a proper petition before the DCLR Maharajganj, preferably within a period of two weeks from today.
7. If such a petition is filed, the DCLR Maharajganj, shall consider the same and bring it to its logical conclusion under the Bihar Land Dispute Resolution Act, 2009 within the period stipulated under the Act.
(Harish Kumar, J) durgesh/- U