Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.1217 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -53 Year- 2013 Thana -MAKER District- SARAN ======================================================
1. Vikash Kumar Son of Gyani Singh Resident of Village Ekderawa Masuriya, P.s Maker, District Saran (Bihar) .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Anuradha Singh (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 29-03-2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case for the offences punishable under sections 302, 201/34 and 304 (B) of the I.P.C Rekha Kumari, the daughter of the informant, was married to the petitioner on 06.03.2012 and after six months of the marriage allegedly the petitioner and other in-laws started demanding dowry by way of Rs. 50,000/- and motorcycle and due to non fulfillment started torturing her for which she used to make complaint to her parents and ultimately she was killed by throttling and her dead body was also thrown in the river Gandak. Submission is of false implication and that the wife of the petitioner committed suicide by hanging herself, information
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1217 of 2016 (3) dt.29-03-2016 2/2 was given to the informant but he lodged this false case, there is no eye witness of the occurrence, other co-accused have been allowed bail and as such the petitioner also deserves sympathetic consideration, to which the learned A.P.P. opposes by submitting that the witnesses have supported regarding demand of cash and the motorcycle and further the petitioner and others threw the dead body in the river Gandak which was seen by Golu Kumar, the grand son of the informant and Rina Devi, the daughter of the informant.
In the facts and circumstances as stated above, considering the allegation attributed against the petitioner, serious in nature, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and accordingly his such prayer stands rejected in connection with Maker P.S. Case No. 53 of 2013 pending in the court of the S.D.J.M. Saran, Chapra.
However, considering detention of the petitioner, let the trial be expedited and concluded within nine months. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Abhay/- U T