Kamlesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6546 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-160 Year-2020 Thana- ARA NAGAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Kamlesh Yadav Aged About 24 Years Son Of Birendra Yadav R/O VillageDhanupara, Raghu Tola, P.S.- Ara Town, District- Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajani Ranjan Pd. Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-04-2021 This matter is taken up for consideration through Video Conferencing.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner prays for grant of regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 414 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, two stolen motorcycles are alleged to have been recovered from the house of the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the house of the petitioner is in front of road and said vehicles have been recovered from the road side and not from the house of the petitioner. He submits that the petitioner has got no concern with the recovered motorcycles. Petitioner has claimed clean

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6546 of 2021(2) dt.16-04-2021 2/2 antecedent and he is in custody since 4.10.2020 and charge sheet has already been submitted.

Considering the period of custody of the petitioner coupled with the fact that the petitioner has got clean antecedent, let the petitioner, mentioned above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara in Ara Nagar Police Station Case No. 160 of 2020 on the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashi/- U T