← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./48427/2019bail granted

Md.Shahud v. The State Of Bihar

2019-08-05Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48427 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-220 Year-2018 Thana- SIKTI District- Araria ====================================================== 1.

MD.SHAHUD son of Md. Yunush 2.

Md. Mahmud son of Md. Yunush 3.

Md. Mahsud son of Md. Yunush 4.

Md. Yunush S/o Late Sultan All are resident of village- Ladkharid, Ward No.10, P.S.- Sikty, DistrictAraria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Md. Ziaul Quamar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dinesh Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 05-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

In this case, the petitioners are seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Sikti P.S. Case No. 220 of 2018 registered for offence punishable under sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. A direct allegation has been made against Md. Mustakim to have caused injury by sharp weapon on the body of the victim and against the rest accused persons, allegation has been made of hurling abuses and also allegation has been made against Mr. Shahud to have snatched

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48427 of 2019(2) dt.05-08-2019 2/2 Rs.10,000/-.

Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for bail of the petitioners is allowed and they, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from today, are directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Sikty P.S. Case No. 220 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438 Cr. PC and also subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence. The petitioners shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T