Jitendra Singh And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.30494 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -21 Year- 2018 Thana -RAFIGANJ District- AURANGABAD ======================================================

1. Jitendra Singh, S/o Late Rameshwar Singh,

2. Adhya Ranjan Kumar @ Adhya Ranjan Singh, S/o Jitendra Singh, R/o Vill.- Kajpa, P.S.- Rafiganj, District- Aurangabad (Bihar). .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Birendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Arif ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 03-07-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Rafiganj P.S.Case No.21 of 2018 , registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 506, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner no.2 is of assault to the informant by Khanti on the forehead and against the petitioner no.1 is that he along with the others assaulted the mother of the informant.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that there is case and counter case between the parties and the injuries are simple except one injury on the foresaid and that caused by hard and blunt substance.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30494 of 2018 (3) dt.03-07-2018 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above , let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Aurangabad in connection with Rafiganj P.S.Case no.21 of 2018, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438

(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioners shall co-operate in the investigation of the case and make themselves available as and when required by the Police, otherwise, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bond. With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T