Vikash Raj Kumar @ Vikash Raj @ Vickey v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.576 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -84 Year- 2015 Thana -MAUZAHIDPUR District- BHAGALPUR ======================================================

1. VIKASH RAJ KUMAR @ VIKASH RAJ @ VICKEY Son of Late Parshuram Das, Resident of Mohalla Munai Chak, P.S. - Tilkamanjhi, District - Bhagalpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Parmod Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Braj Kishore Prasad (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 12-02-2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case for the offences punishable under sections 392 and 411 of the I.P.C Allegedly, four miscreants robbed the informant and took away cash of Rs. 6,400/- and mobile of Lava Company but with the help of local police the petitioner was apprehended with country made katta and the robbed mobile.

Submission is of false implication and that for the same occurrence two cases have been registered and the petitioner has been allowed bail in the case instituted under Arms Act, for the alleged recovery of mobile the petitioner by remaining in

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.576 of 2016 (3) dt.12-02-2016 2/2 custody has been sufficiently penalized as he is in custody since 07.05.2015, to which the learned A.P.P. does not dispute. In the facts and circumstances as stated above, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Bhagalpur in Mojahidpur P.S. Case No. 84 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Abhay/- U T