← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./51231/2025disposed

Sonu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-08-12Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51231 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-162 Year-2025 Thana- KARAKAT District- Rohtas ====================================================== Sonu Kumar S/o Lalbabu Singh R/o Village- Tilma Chaugari, P.S.- Karakat (Godari), District- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Malti Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 12-08-2025 Heard Ms. Malti Kumari, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Karakat P.S. Case No. 162 of 2025 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 352, 329(4), 74, 115(2), 109 of the BNS.

3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, the petitioner along with other accused indulged into fierce fight with the informant and his family members, in which allegation against the petitioner is that he had assaulted one Dinesh Singh on the vital part of his body, causing him injury.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51231 of 2025(2) dt.12-08-2025 2/3

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that petitioner is innocent. There is case and counter case between the parties. The allegation as alleged against the petitioner is not sustainable in the light of the fact that the petitioner in self defense may have caused some injuries without intention. The petitioner has clean antecedent. On these grounds, the petitioner seeks to be released on pre-arrest bail.

5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.

6. Having considered the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well as, having perused the impugned order, wherein, it has been recorded that the injury report is reserved and in absence of specific report to verify, as to whether, the injury is grievous or simple in nature, the learned District Court is directed to call for the injury report and if the learned District Court finds that the injury is simple in nature then in that case the petitioner deserves to be released on prearrest bail on such terms and conditions, which the learned District Court deems it fit and proper, and if the same comes out to be grevious in nature then in that case the petitioner should be taken into custody, forthwith.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51231 of 2025(2) dt.12-08-2025 3/3

7. Accordingly, the present application stands disposed of.

(Purnendu Singh, J) Ashishsingh/- U T