Raj Mangal Pandey v. The State Of Bihar Through The Director General Of Police, Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.801 of 2016 ======================================================
1. Raj Mangal Pandey Son of Ramanand Pandey, resident of VillageBasantpur Bakhari, P.S.- Sakara, District- Muzaffarpur .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar Through The Director General of Police, Bihar
2. The Zonal I.G. Muzaffarpur
3. The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur
4. The Senior Superintedent of Police , Muzaffarpur
5. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur.
6. The officer- in-Charge, Sakara Police Station, Muzaffarpur
7. The Investigating Office, Sakara P.S. Case No. 343/2015, Sakara Police Station, Muzaffarpur
8. The Civil Surgeon, Muzaffarpur
9. The Medical Board Under the Chairmanship of the Civil Surgeon, Muzaffarpur
10. Shambhu Nath Pandey Son of Late Triveni Pandey
11. Subodh Pandey @ Nathuni Pandey son of Late Triveni Pandey
12. Manish Chandra Pandey @ Kanhaiya Pandey son of Shambhu Nath Pandey
13. Krishna Chandra Pandey @ Bambam Pandey son of Shambhu Nath Pandey
14. Shashi Prabha wife of Shambhu Nath Pandey
15. Gita Devi wife of Subodh Pandey
16. Manju Devi wife of Kanhaiya Pandey @ Manish Chandra Pandey All are resident of Village- Basantpur, Bakhri, P.S.- Sakara, DistrictMuzaffarpur .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Kant Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sheo Shankar Prasad (SC-8) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 30-08-2016 Heard Mr. Krishna Kant Singh, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, and Mr. Sheo Shankar Prasad, learned Standing Counsel No.8, appearing on behalf of the State-respondents.
Having considered the averments made in the writ
Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.801 of 2016 (2) dt.30-08-2016 2/2 petition and materials on record and upon hearing the parties, it is hereby directed that respondent No.4, namely, Senior Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur, shall enquire into the grievances raised in the writ petition, do the needful in accordance with law and get the investigation of Sakara P.S. Case No.343 of 2015 completed expeditiously, preferably, within a period of six months, ensuring proper, fair and effective investigation in such a way that no innocent person is harassed.
Let a copy of this order be sent forthwith to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur, and Officer-inCharge, Sakara Police Station. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ petition stands disposed of.
(I.A. Ansari,CJ) Mkr./- U T