Bijendra Sada @ Dhokaya @ Dhokay @ Vijendra Sada v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50416 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-315 Year-2024 Thana- PIPRA District- Supaul ====================================================== Bijendra Sada @ Dhokaya @ Dhokay @ Vijendra Sada Son of Bauku Sada Resident of Village- Ramnagar, P.S.- Pipra, District- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Arun, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Anand Kishore Choudhary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 22-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 315 of 2024 instituted for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109 & 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3.
The prosecution case, in short, is that the petitioner, along with other named accused, formed an unlawful assembly, wrongfully restrained the informant's brother inside a house, and Jitendra Sada gave a sword attack on him, causing grievous head injuries.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50416 of 2026(2) dt.22-07-2026 2/3 4.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 08.02.2026. Petitioner bears no criminal antecedent, as per disclosure made in paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.
5.
It has been further submitted by the petitioner's counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. From perusal of the FIR, it would reveal that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner, rather the same is against other co-accused person. Allegation against the petitioner is confined to only caught holding the injured. There is no specific allegation of assault levelled against the petitioner. Charge sheet has already been submitted in this case. 6.
Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 7.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner, there being no specific allegation against the petitioner and charge sheet being submitted, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 8.
Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50416 of 2026(2) dt.22-07-2026 3/3 315 of 2024.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T