Anmol Yadav And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Letters Patent Appeal No.234 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7278 of 2016 ======================================================
1. Anmol Yadav
2. Raj Kishiore Yadav Both sons of Late Hari Lal Yadav, Both Resident of VillageKanhaili, P.S.- Narpatganj, District- Araria. ... ... Petitioners-Appellant/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Revenue, Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Forbesganj, Araria.
3. The Circle Officer, Narpatganj, Forbesganj, Araria.
4. Rajo Yadav,
5. Satto Yadav,
6. Ramanand Yadav, Respondent nos. 4 to 6 sons of late Panchanand Yadav.
7. Tarkeshwar Yadav,
8. Jay Kumar Yadav,
9. Anand Yadav,
10. Shiva Nand Yadav, All respondent No. 7 to 10 sons of late Uday Chand Yadav. All are residents of Village- Kanhaili, P.S. Narpatganj, District- Araria. ... ... Respondents-Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s :
Mr. K.N. Singh, Senior Advocate :
Mr. Dr. Kamal Deo Sharma, Advocate For the Pvt. Respondent/s :
Mr. Durgesh Nandan, Advocate :
Mrs. Manisha Prakash, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 26-09-2018 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants seeks permission to withdraw the present Letters Patent Appeal as now the appellants propose to file review application before the learned Single Judge with additional documents, which, according to the appellants, were before the
Patna High Court LPA No.234 of 2017(12) dt.26-09-2018 2/2 authorities below.
Without expressing anything on merits and/or without expressing anything on the maintainability of such review application, now, the present Letters Patent Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. As and when such review application is preferred, the same shall be dealt with in accordance with law, for which, we have not expressed anything in favour of any of the parties. (Mukesh R. Shah, CJ) (Ashutosh Kumar, J) Sunil/-s.shukla U