Pinki Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51870 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-48 Year-2023 Thana- BHAGWANPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== PINKI DEVI WIFE OF SANJEEV KUMAR SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RAMPUR BAKHRA PS BHAGWANPUR DIST VAISHALI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pranav Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Rajeev Ranjan No.I, Adv.

Mrs. Priyanka Kumari, Adv.

Mrs. Anjana Gupta, Adv.

Mrs. Kumari Rupa, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar No. 2, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 02-11-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The allegation against the petitioner is that she along with other accused persons kidnapped the informant's granddaughter, namely, Aditi Kumari.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. No such occurrence as alleged ever took place. She has been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is totally false and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51870 of 2023(4) dt.02-11-2023 2/2 based on concocted facts. She has been made accused in the present case merely on suspicion. Petitioner has also lodged an FIR against the informant and his family members as her daughter is also traceless. Later on, when the informant's granddaughter was traced, her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. has been recorded in which she has not supported the prosecution case. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, as the victim has not supported the prosecution case, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 48 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T