Patna High CourtL.P.A/1098/2015dismissed

Manish Kumar Das And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-08-02Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad,Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1098 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 11519 of 2007 ======================================================

1. Manish Kumar Das Son of Madhoosudan Das resident of Mohalla - Railway Colony ( Quarter No. 235/B ), P.S. Jhajha, District - Jamui

2. Thakur Pandit Son of Sri Shukkar resident of village - Barajore, P.S. Jhajha, District - Jamui

3. Basant Kumar Sharma Son of Late Nageshwar Prasad Sharma resident of Mohalla - Khalasi Mohalla, P.S. Jhajha, District - Jamui

4. Ajay Mandal Son of Late Jhaman Mandal resident of village - Gidhdhko, P.S. Jhajha, District - Jamui .... .... Appellants

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Department of Health, Government of Bihar, Patna

2. The Secretary, Department of Health, Government of Bihar, Patna

3. The Director - In - Chief Health Services, Government of Bihar, Patna

4. The Chief Malaria officer, Bihar, Patna

5. The District Malaria officer, Munger

6. The Secretary, Department of Finance, Government of Bihar, Patna

7. The District Malaria officer, Jamui

8. The Executive Director - Cum - Special Secretary, State Health Society, Parivar Kalyan Bhawan, Sheikhpura, Patna

9. Dr. A.K. Tiwari, I/C Malaria and Kalazar Division, State Health Society, Bihar, Parivar Kalyan Bhavan, Sheikhpura, Patna .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Sourendra Pandey, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sita Ram Yadav, G.P.16 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) 2.

02-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel for the State.

Keeping in view that in identical matter an order dated 12.07.2017 has been passed in Letters Patent Appeal No. 348/2015. Keeping in mind the direction which

Patna High Court LPA No.1098 of 2015 (2) dt.02-08-2017 has been issued by the learned Single Judge in the order impugned dated 16.12.2014, nothing more is required to be added or said, over and above what has already been said on the issue.

This appeal is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J.) Rajeev/- U