← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./60321/2021allowed

Sidhnath Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2022-05-13Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60321 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2 Year-2021 Thana- AGRER District- Rohtas ====================================================== Sidhnath Sah S/O Late Laxman Sah R/O Village-Mokar, P.S-Agrer, DistrictRohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shankar Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Parmeshwar Mehta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 13-05-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955.

It is a case of recovery of about 289 bags of fertilizes from a shop.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that entire allegation has been based on the statement of two ladies, namely, Dipika Kumari and Jubaida Khatoon, who refused to get purchase the fertilizers, except this, there is no material against the petitioner to show the violation of any terms and conditions of authorization granted to the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60321 of 2021(2) dt.13-05-2022 2/2 petitioner under E.C. Act. He further submits that it is well settled principle of law that licensee/authorization of retail dealer of cement cannot be prosecuted in a criminal case of 7 E.C. Act unless and until the show cause of explanation is called upon from him whether he has committed gross malpractices and violated the very terms and conditions of his licence. Petitioner has got clean antecedent.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioner, above named in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Rohtas (Sasaram) in connection with Agrer P.S. Case No. 02 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U T