Md. Khurshid Alam @ Khurshid v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48909 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-231 Year-2026 Thana- DEHRI TOWN District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.
Md. Khurshid Alam @ Khurshid Son of Md. Imtiyaz Alam @ Chhote Resident of Mohalla - idgah, Ward No.23, PS -Dehri Nagar, Dist -Rohtas 2.
Md. Arman Ahmed @ Md. Arman Son of Md. Aslam Ahmad @ Iddu Resident of Mohalla - idgah, Ward No.23, PS -Dehri Nagar, Dist -Rohtas 3.
Md. Mustafa @ Md. Mustfa @ Vicky Son of Mahroom Md. Aslam Resident of Mohalla - idgah, Ward No.23, PS -Dehri Nagar, Dist -Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Babu Nandan Prasad, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Md. Matloob Rab, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 22-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case in connection with Dehri Town P.S. Case No. 231 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S.
3. As per the allegations, the petitioners have been identified as being among the 15-20 persons who allegedly assaulted the informant by means of gadasa and sword.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. It has further been submitted referring to injury report which is annexed as Annexure-P/3 to this bail application that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48909 of 2026(2) dt.22-07-2026 2/2 there happens to be only one injury i.e. lacerated cut injury on occipital region and the same was opined to be simple in nature. It has further been submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated due to local village politics. It has lastly been submitted that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedents.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
6. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Dehri, Rohtas in connection with Dehri Town P.S. Case No. 231 of 2026, subject to conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
8. The application stands allowed.
(Praveen Kumar, J) Ankit Kumar/- U T