← Library
Patna High CourtL.P.A/571/2015dismissed

Dilip Kumar Sah v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-07-17Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad,Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.571 of 2015 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 297 of 2014 =========================================================== Dilip Kumar Sah Son of Late Jai Narayan sah, resident of Murari Tola, P.O. & P.S. Kasba, District- Purnea.

.... .... Petitioner / Appellant

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

2. Commissioner, Purnea Division, Purnea

3. Collector, Purnea.

4. Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar, Purnea.

5. Deputy Inspector General of Police, Purnea.

6. Superintendent of Police, Purnea.

7. Officer-in-Charge, Kasba P.S., District- Purnea.

8. Mosomat Somo Devi, Wife of Late Bhagu Uraon.

9. Sanjna Uraon, Son of Bhagu Uraon.

10. Mosomat Jharo Devi wife of Late Munshi Uraon.

11. Bishnudeo Uraon, son of Late Munshi Uraon.

12. Bijay Uraon son of Late Munshi Uraon.

13. Mahabir Uraon, Son of Late Budhu Uraon

14. Jirki Uraon wife of Mahabir Uraon

15. Sanjay Uraon Son of Mahabir Uraon

16. Ajay Uraon Son of Mahabir Uraon All resident of village Jawanpur (Ward no. 17), Mauja Jawanpur, Post Madarghat (Kasba), P.S. Kasba, District- Purnea.

.... .... Respondents / Respondents =========================================================== Appearance:

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Kumar Uday Singh, Advocate. For the Respondent/s : Mr. SC1- M.K. SINHA =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) Date: 17-07-2017 Perused the order dated 19.02.2015 passed by the learned Single Judge.

Dismissal of the Writ Application giving leeway and

Patna High Court LPA No.571 of 2015 dt.17-07-2017 2/2 liberty to the appellant to take recourse to civil law does not seem to be misplaced in the given facts.

Appeal has no merit. It is dismissed.

Dismissal of the appeal will not come in the way of the appellant for seeking remedy within the framework of law. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Dilip, AR AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 18.07.2017 Transmission Date N/A