Vidyasagar Prasad v. The State Bank Of India And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.986 of 2014 ====================================================== Vidyasagar Prasad S/O Late Kishun Deo Prasad, Resident of Ward No.- 3, P.S.- Sheohar, District- Sheohar, Proprietor of M/S Sweta Enterprises, Ward No. 3, Sheohar, District- Sheohar .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. State Bank Of India, Sheohar Branch, Sheohar, DistrictSheohar

2. The Authorised Officer, State Bank of India, Sheohar Branch, Sheohar

3. The Regional Manager, State Bank of India, Regional Business Office, Club Road, Muzaffarpur .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjeet Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : M/s Binod bihari Sinha with Sushant Kumar Dutta, Advocates ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 11-02-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has been settled in Rashtriya Lok Adalat held on 6.12.2014 as both parties have compromised the lis. A copy of the Award has been produced at the time of hearing. Let it be taken on record. As such, it is contended that the same renders this writ

Patna High Court CWJC No.986 of 2014 (2) dt.11-02-2015 2/2 petition infructuous.

In the above view of the matter, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) Spd/- U