Chandan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49319 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-74 Year-2024 Thana- TETERHAT District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== 1.

Chandan Kumar Son of Belu Singh Village -Sharma PS- Tetarhat Dist -Lakhisarai 2.

Belu Singh son of Pachan Singh Village -Sharma PS- Tetarhat Dist -Lakhisarai 3.

Anil Singh son of Pachan Singh Village -Sharma PS- Tetarhat Dist -Lakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Parmanand Pd. Nr. Sahi, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nityanand, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 06-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Tetarhat P.S. Case No. 74 of 2024 instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 341, 323, 307, 504, 506 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners along with others surrounded the informant and started assaulting and abusing by means of bamboo stick. It is specifically alleged that Chandan Kumar assaulted with lathi.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49319 of 2025(2) dt.06-08-2025 2/3

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. They have falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that there is also a counter version of this case. It has also been submitted that from perusal of the injury report, it transpires that the informant has received simple injury caused by hard and blunt substance. A statement has been made in para3 of this petition that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. Learned trial court has rejected the anticipatory bail of the petitioners as they have concealed their criminal antecedent.

5. In contra, learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of bail of the petitioners and submitted that petitioners are having one criminal antecedent.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Tetarhat P.S. Case No. 74 of 2024, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49319 of 2025(2) dt.06-08-2025 3/3 Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Shubham/- U T