Rambodh Bind v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52617 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-205 Year-2025 Thana- RAMGARH District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== 1.
Rambodh Bind S/o Suresh Bind R/o Vill- Sahuka, P.S.- Ramgarh, DisttKaimur at Bhabua 2.
Ramjag Bind S/o Suresh Bind R/o Vill- Sahuka, P.S.- Ramgarh, DisttKaimur at Bhabua 3.
Ganesh Bind S/o Vikrama Bind R/o Vill- Sahuka, P.S.- Ramgarh, DisttKaimur at Bhabua 4.
Suresh Bind S/o Vikrama Bind R/o Vill- Sahuka, P.S.- Ramgarh, DisttKaimur at Bhabua ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Tribhuwan Narayan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Nirala, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 13-08-2025 Heard Mr. Tribhuwan Narayan, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Nirala, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Ramgarh P.S. Case No. 205 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 02.06.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109(1), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.
3. Allegation against the petitioners is that they came into the house of the informant and started abusing and assaulted the informant's family. During course of assault they
2/4 gave blow on the head of informant's wife, her head was brusted. They showed pistol and threatened for dire consequence if case be filed against them.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner nos. 1 and 2 having clean antecedents and petitioner nos. 3 and 4 carry one more case other than the present one in which they are on bail in the pending matters. It appears from the F.I.R that although the petitioners are named in the F.I.R. but there is no specific allegation of any assault or overt act attributed against these petitioners rather there is general and omnibus allegation against all the accused persons including these petitioners and the informant is brother of petitioner nos. 3 and 4.
5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that there is no specific allegation of any assault or overt act attributed against the petitioners rather there is general and omnibus allegation against these petitioners, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on
3/4 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-II, Kaimur at Bhabhua in connection with Ramgarh P.S. Case No. 205 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/ Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023 and with other following conditions :-
(1) Petitioners shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on their absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be cancelled by the Court below.
(2) If the petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(3) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioners have concealed their criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioners. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order
4/4 shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- U T