← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./60195/2021bail granted

Reena Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2022-07-12Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60195 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-98 Year-2020 Thana- BAUNSI District- Banka ====================================================== 1.

REENA DEVI W/o Pankaj Das R/o village- Gangata, P.S.- Bounsi, DistrictBanka 2.

Pinki Devi W/o Mukesh Das R/o village- Gangata, P.S.- Bounsi, DistrictBanka ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Brij Nandad Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Anurag Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 12-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 302, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 03.05.2020 one Naresh Das was digging the land of the informant and when the husband of the informant Babulal Das objected, Naresh Das along with his four sons assaulted him with lathi, it is next alleged that on instruction of Naresh Das his son Mukesh Das assaulted the informant's husband with spade due to which he sustained grievous injuries on his head.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60195 of 2021(2) dt.12-07-2022 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case, from the side of the petitioners, Bounsi P.S. Case No. 99 of 2020 was registered against the present informant, it is next submitted that petitioners being daughter-in-law of Naresh Das have been implicated in the present case without alleging any overt act of assault.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Bounsi P.S. Case No. 98 of 2020 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Shivam/- U T