Chandra Shekhar Paswan @ Chano Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6637 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-91 Year-2020 Thana- ROSERA District- Samastipur ====================================================== CHANDRA SHEKHAR PASWAN @ CHANO PASWAN SON OF MADHURI PASWAN R/O VILL.- MAARA JEEV, P.S.- ROSERA, DIST.- SAMASTIPUR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjit Kumar Yadav, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Uma Shanker Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 02-07-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State through video conferencing. The petitioner has filed the instant application for grant of regular bail in connection with Rosera P.S. Case No. 91 of 2020 registered under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. As per allegation in the F.I.R., it is stated by the informant that after transacting with other businessman, while his driver was coming carrying cash to the tune of Rs.4.14 lacs, on the point of revolver and knife, the accused persons beat him up and took away the money. It is stated by the informant that the role of the driver appears to be suspicious. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. His name transpired

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6637 of 2021(5) dt.02-07-2021 2/2 in course of investigation on the confessional statement of Bechan Paswan made before police. No incriminating article has been recovered from his possession and he is in custody since 17.3.2020. It is submitted that for the error that occurred in paragraph no.3 of the petition, supplementary affidavit has been filed mentioning about the petitioner's antecedents. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case including the petitioner not having been put on T.I. parade in spite of being in custody since 17.3.2020 i.e., for more than one year, the Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Rosera P.S. Case No. 91 of 2020 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Rosera.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Bibhash U T