Avinash Sharma @ Vicky Sharma @ Avinash Kumar @ Vicky v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50245 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-720 Year-2024 Thana- RAFIGANJ District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Avinash Sharma @ Vicky Sharma @ Avinash Kumar @ Vicky, S/O Sri Mithilesh Kumar @ Mithilesh Sharma, R/O Vill.- Charkawan Upari Dih, P.S.- Rafiganj, Dist.- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kr. Thakure, Advocate Mrs. Vaishnavi Singh, Advocate Mr. Ritwik Thakur, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bharat Bhushan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 16-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Rafiganj P.S. Case No. 720 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a and 26 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that during course of raid made at the house of the petitioner, one country made tharnet, one country made pistol, one live cartridge of 8 mm, one misfired cartridge and one empty cartridge of 8 mm, one live cartridge and four empty cartridges were recovered from a jute bag hanging in the toilet room.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50245 of 2025(3) dt.16-10-2025 2/2

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from his possession. It has also been submitted that from perusal of the seizure list it will transpire that the witnesses of the seizure list are not the independent persons and it does not contain even the signature of this petitioner. He is languishing in judicial custody since 24.05.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IV, Aurangabad in connection with Rafiganj P.S. Case No. 720 of 2024. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T