← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./53845/2023dismissed

Nitesh Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2023-08-25Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53845 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-73 Year-2018 Thana- ISUAPUR District- Saran ====================================================== NITESH KUMAR SINGH SON OF BIRENDRA SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- TEDHA, PS- ISUAPUR, DISTT- SARAN AT CHAPRA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Narendra Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs.Pushpa Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 25-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Isuapur P.S. Case No.73 of 2018, registered for the offence punishable u/s 366(A) of the IPC.

3.

As per the F.I.R., daughter of the informant has been kidnapped by the owners of three mobile number holders, which is mentioned in the F.I.R.

4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He is not named in the F.I.R. and has been falsely implicated in this case. There is no specific allegation against the petitioner and he is neighbour of the informant and due to local politics, he has been implicated in this case. He has no criminal antecedent.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53845 of 2023(2) dt.25-08-2023 2/2 5.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail by submitting that after the recovery of the victim, her statement was recorded u/s 164 Cr.P.C., in which, she has supported the prosecution case.

6.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the statement of the victim u/s 164 Cr.P.C., I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on his behalf is hereby rejected. 7.

This application is accordingly dismissed.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T