Patna High CourtCWJC/2264/2015dismissed

Chamak Lal Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-02-06Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2264 of 2015 ====================================================== Chamak Lal Singh, S/o Bhagwat Pd. Singh, residing at Patel Nagar, Purab Tola, Kahalgaon, P.O. + P.S. Kahalgaon, District - Bhagalpur .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

3. The Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

4. The State Project Director, Bihar Education Project Council, Bihar, Patna

5. The Director, S.C.E.R.T., Bihar, Patna

6. The District Education Officer, Bhagalpur, District Bhagalpur

7. The District Programme Officer, Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, Bhagalpur, District Bhagalpur

8. The Director, Research and Training, Bihar, Patna

9. The District Programme Officer ( Est. ), Bhagalpur, District Bhagalpur

10. The Principal, District Education and Training Instituation (DIET), District Bhagalpur

11. The Block Education Officer, Kahalgaon, District Bhagalpur .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Gupta, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Ajit Pratap Singh, S.C.-15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER 06-02-2015 The present writ application is only to pre-empt and derail the process, which has been forced to be taken by the respondent-authorities, under the circumstances which appears in detail in Annexure 8. Petitioner will surely have liberty to challenge the decision of initiation of a proceeding in accordance with law.

So far as removal of the petitioner as Resource Person is concerned, that is not substantive post and position

Patna High Court CWJC No.2264 of 2015 (2) dt.06-02-2015 2/2 which he holds, therefore, the decision to withdraw such assignment cannot be interfered with by a Writ Court. The writ application is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) PNM U